Comments for Thick Clouds http://thickclouds.com A virtualization site with a few thoughts to clear the air... Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:53:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ Comment on VMware HA Isolation Response Bug by duncan http://thickclouds.com/2010/06/29/vmware-ha-isolation-response-bug/#comment-14 Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:53:22 +0000 http://thickclouds.com/?p=46#comment-14 can you drop me an email about this. wondering who you spoke with as my contacts can’t confirm this issue or reproduce it. see the comment for my mail.

]]> Comment on VMware HA Isolation Response Bug by Technology Short Takes #1 - blog.scottlowe.org - The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers http://thickclouds.com/2010/06/29/vmware-ha-isolation-response-bug/#comment-13 Wed, 18 Aug 2010 05:38:26 +0000 http://thickclouds.com/?p=46#comment-13 [...] on vSphere How to Configure Likewise “Open” Integration on vMA Got Network I/O Control? VMware HA Isolation Response Bug Cisco, VMware: Nexus 1000V Tracking VM Interface [...]

]]> Comment on VMware HA Isolation Response Bug by Tweets that mention VMware HA Isolation Response Bug | Thick Clouds -- Topsy.com http://thickclouds.com/2010/06/29/vmware-ha-isolation-response-bug/#comment-5 Wed, 30 Jun 2010 03:35:38 +0000 http://thickclouds.com/?p=46#comment-5 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John Troyer / VMware, Charles Gautreaux. Charles Gautreaux said: VMware HA Isolation Response Bug: http://wp.me/pYk7R-K [...]

]]> Comment on VMware HA Isolation Response Bug by cgautreaux http://thickclouds.com/2010/06/29/vmware-ha-isolation-response-bug/#comment-4 Wed, 30 Jun 2010 02:38:01 +0000 http://thickclouds.com/?p=46#comment-4 Andy –

Unfortunately not my friend. Confirmed today with VMware Engineering. Should know more in a few days…

Charlie

]]> Comment on VMware HA Isolation Response Bug by Andy Daniel http://thickclouds.com/2010/06/29/vmware-ha-isolation-response-bug/#comment-2 Wed, 30 Jun 2010 01:23:29 +0000 http://thickclouds.com/?p=46#comment-2 Charlie, I thought this was fixed in U2, no? I do love how the explanation talks about how “VMFS” locking mechanisms are used :)

“When a virtual machine running on a NAS datastore is configured to shut down in response to host isolation, the virtual machine might attempt to run simultaneously on two hosts in a network isolation event.”

http://www.vmware.com/support/vsphere4/doc/vsp_esx40_u2_rel_notes.html#resolvedissues

]]>